Maurice Jarre
Human Design Chart
Biography
Married four times, he was formerly married to France Pejot and their son, Jean-Michel Jarre (born on 24 August 1948) is a noted composer of synthesizer music with his own studio. He married Fong in 1984.
Jarre died in Malibu, CA on 28 March 2009 after a "brief illness" (some say cancer). He was 84.
The Human Design of Maurice Jarre: Projector 4/6
Projector 4/6 — Design at a Glance
Maurice Jarre appeared as someone with a dense, focused aura that immediately influenced his surroundings. As a Projector, he did not have the constant intrinsic energy source of other types' defined Sacral Center; instead, he had phases of high activity followed by necessary rest periods for regeneration. His design predisposed him to quickly identify weaknesses in systems or people around him – like a bright flashlight shining directly into darkness.
This ability to spot errors could be misunderstood if he addressed them directly. The more elegant expression of his design was to attract others through his own harmony and clarity. People would then seek out his advice voluntarily, rather than feeling attacked. His strategy lay in waiting for respectful invitations from the environment. When invited, he could take on his specific leadership role. If he did not live by this principle of invitation and respect for his energy cycles, there was a risk of burning out. In accordance with his design, he was rewarded for guided interactions; deviating led to the non-self theme of bitterness. His path involved being light without blinding others forcibly but guiding them through radiant presence.
Self-Projected Authority
Maurice Jarre appeared as a Projector with rare authority in Self. This design laid an extreme openness alongside the danger of being distracted by external motoric energies. The central challenge was not to succumb to irritability and constantly chase after energy. His inner truth lay in his identity. Decisions for him arose on two paths: through self-conversations or dialogical listening upon invitation. Crucial was distinguishing between spontaneous expression of true essence and mental deliberations. This immediate self-expression made his uniqueness recognizable to others. Alternatively, a physical feeling would draw him geographically or thematically into a specific direction. By following this inner pull, he could become a guide and unleash his specific success potential. This mechanism directly involved the defined Self Center as the bearer of authority. Maurice Jarre lived this structure in the past; his way of deciding was based on immediate access to identity, not intellectual analysis or emotional reaction. The danger of energy loss through distraction was always present while strength arose from loyalty to spontaneous self-expression and physical pull.
The 4/6 Profile — Opportunist / Role Model
Maurice Jarre appeared as someone who throughout his life sought a balance between the deep need for belonging and the urge to withdraw to observe things from a distance. In his youth, he intensely experimented with relationships and friendships, driven by Line 4 in Profile 4/6, which often acts like an exploratory Line 3 in the first thirty years. He instinctively hoped for external support to free himself from situations of distress – a pattern that frequently only led to further confusion as the solution did not lie outside.
Over time, this attitude evolved. The activation of Line 6 brought to light the conflict between Heart and Head: On one hand, he wanted to be part of the network; on the other, metaphorically standing on a mountain contemplating meaning. This development progressed from trial and error towards a role as an authentic role model. He learned to integrate strangers and use their eccentricity to strengthen the 'tribe' rather than rejecting them. Yet, he remained cautious; his big heart protected him from opening up to the wrong people. His task was to step forward through cooperation with others without losing his own individual mutation – a balance between collective adaptation and personal authenticity.
Split Definition — Defined & Open Centers
Maurice Jarre revealed himself as someone who constantly felt an internal pressure to ask questions and understand connections. His defined Head Center and Ajna Center created a permanent mental activity; he was not designed to directly translate these thoughts into physical actions but rather offer them as inspiration or conceptual clarity. This mental process flowed into his defined Throat Center, which allowed him to express his concepts and answers reliably. Parallel to this, his defined G Center gave him a solid inner identity and a clear sense of direction independent of external expectations.
This stable core contrasted strongly with his open centers. His open Heart Center made him vulnerable to trying to prove his worth through willpower or promises, often ending in cycles of self-doubt if he did not listen to his inner authority. The open Sacral Center meant that he lacked a constant generative energy; he was dependent on absorbing the vitality of others and had to learn to set boundaries to avoid burnout. Additionally, his open Solar Plexus absorbed the emotions of his environment, leading him to personalize foreign feelings as his own and avoid conflicts out of fear of rejection. His open Spleen Center caused him to cling to situations or people offering a false sense of security rather than trusting in his intuitive health. Finally, his open Root Center took on external stress that he was not supposed to experience personally; if identified with it, this could drive him into cycles of chaos and burnout.
Channels for abstract comprehension and logical leadership.
Maurice Jarre revealed himself as someone who combined logical structures with a deep, often confusing inner search for meaning. His design inclined towards collective leadership based not on authoritarian power but on the trust of the community. This was marked by the Alpha Animal Channel 7-31: Gate 7 provided the logical role of manager or general, while Gate 31 acted as a collective leader. This configuration required Jarre to be invited before sharing his visions; he could show the way but not necessarily walk it himself. His authority arose from understanding existing patterns and projecting trends into the future, always dependent on the approval of his environment.
Parallel to this, intense mental activity drove him to filter experiences through a kaleidoscope of images. The Abstraction Channel 64-47 connected the Head Center with the Ajna Center and created a constant pressure to find meaning in life. Gate 64 often brought confusion, while Gate 47 sought the true understanding. Jarre had to patiently wait for this mental unrest to crystallize into a clear story or an inspiring perspective that he could then share. This process was less suited to solving personal problems but served to create new perspectives for others.
Additionally, individual gates influenced his way of acting. Gate 45 in the cross emphasized the tribal level and the attraction of like forces, promoting welfare and cohesion. Gate 26 allowed him to integrate innovations into conservative structures often through persuasive power. Gate 22 brought openness to mutations and enabled him to listen calmly without being intrusive. On a personality level, Gate 4 helped develop logical formulas for future security and clarify suspicious patterns. Finally, Gate 20 anchored him in the present moment, promoted authentic selfhood, and allowed integration through correct action in the current situation.
Collective Circuitry — Circuit Signature
Maurice Jarre's design inclined towards separate, coexisting energetic fields. As a person with Split Definition, he did not have an uninterrupted connection between all his defined centers; instead, two independent power blocks worked alongside each other without direct communication. This shaped his internal structure as someone who experienced different aspects of their experience not in one continuous flow but as distinct areas.
The Understanding Circuit connected his Throat Center with the Identity Center through the channel 'The Alpha Animal'. This connection fostered the ability to articulate and share logical and strategic insights, driven by a focus on future-oriented solutions. It was a rational energy that operated free from emotional conditioning.
Parallel to this, the Meaning Making Circuit linked his Head Center with Ajna. Here it was not about cool logic but cyclical emotional waves and reflecting past experiences. This energy sought meaning behind events and prepared insights for later sharing. Since these two circuits were not connected in Maurice Jarre's chart, they existed as separate systems: one for rational communication and identity, the other for emotional processing and sense-making from the past.
Right Angle Cross of Rulership 3
Maurice Jarre's Human Design profile indicated a tendency towards clear and structured orientation. He was someone who often sought internal order in his work and actions. This attitude stemmed from the so-called 'Right Governing Cross 3'. In Human Design mechanics, this pattern describes a specific energy configuration that aims for stability and clear hierarchies. It wasn't about arbitrary decisions but rather a deeply rooted need for a solid framework within which creativity or action could take place. For Maurice Jarre, this likely meant he preferred situations where roles and expectations were clearly defined. The Governing Cross often links the power of will with the necessity to use that power in a controlled manner. Number 3 indicates an early or fundamental imprinting that influenced his entire life. He did not live in chaos but sought ways to channel his energy purposefully. This structure helped him break down complex demands into manageable units. It was a mechanism of self-assertion through organization and discipline. Maurice Jarre used this inner architecture to navigate his environment and pursue his goals with a certain determination. The energy of this cross supported him in accepting or exercising authority, always within clear boundaries. His design thus promoted a lifestyle based on reliability and structural integrity.
Saturn Return · Uranus Opposition · Chiron Return · 2nd Saturn Return — Life Cycles
Maurice Jarre was someone whose creative power was strongly influenced by external impulses and societal changes. His Uranus opposition around the age of 39 marked a turning point where established structures were challenged in unexpected ways. This was reflected in 1963 when he won an Oscar for 'Lawrence of Arabia' – a success that not only meant personal recognition but also ushered in a new phase of artistic freedom.
Later, at his second Saturn return around age 60, Maurice Jarre entered a period of consolidation and reorganization. The second Saturn return often brings profound changes in both private and professional life as old patterns are questioned and new paths must be taken. In this year 1984, he won another Oscar for 'A Passage to India', while simultaneously going through his divorce from Laura Devon and marrying Fong F. Khong. These events underscore how this period was marked by both career peaks and personal upheavals.
The combination of Uranus opposition and Saturn return highlights Maurice Jarre's ability to succeed externally despite internal tensions, while also redefining his identity.
Projector · Self-Projected Authority — Synthesis
Maurice Jarre was a Projector whose ability to recognize patterns (Gate 7 & 31) and project them onto others made him an influential figure. His defined Head Center created a constant mental pressure to question and provide inspiration – he quickly saw where improvements were needed, always focusing on logical future outcomes (Understanding Circuit). This tendency towards recognizing flaws was linked with the Profile of Networker/Role Model, which pushed him to form connections while also setting high standards for himself.
A central paradox in his design lay in the interplay between a desire for belonging (Line 4) and a tendency towards isolated contemplation on larger contexts (Line 6). This led to an internal tension that made him constantly oscillate between the need for cooperation and the drive for individual wisdom. The repeated experiences of recognition and change throughout cycles – both successes and personal upheavals – reflected this conflict, showing a personality dependent on external validation yet possessing a strong inner compass.
2 Defined Channels
Incarnation Cross - Right Angle Cross of Rulership 3
Solar Return
The Solar Return shows the moment when the sun returns to its exact birth position - your personal solar year.
Life Cycles
Discover the life cycles with a detailed triple view (birth chart, cycle chart, composite).
Human Design Profile
- Type
- Projector
- Strategy
- Wait for the respectful invitation
- Authority
- Self-Projected Authority
- Profile
- 4/6 - Opportunist / Role Model
- Definition
- Split Definition
- Incarnation Cross
- Right Angle Cross of Rulership 3
- Date of Birth
- 13.09.1924 13:00
- Place of Birth
- Lyon, France
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Maurice Jarre's Human Design type?
What Profile did Maurice Jarre have in Human Design?
What Authority did Maurice Jarre have?
What incarnation cross did Maurice Jarre have?
When was Maurice Jarre born?
Discover your own Human Design
Are you also a Projector? Find out in a personal reading how to unfold your leadership qualities and recognize the right invitations.
More Personalities
Back to overviewSissy Spacek
Aaliyah
Alain-Fournier
Alexia
Alizée
Anémone