Susan Atkins
Human Design Chart
Biography
A hippie dropout product of the drug culture, she met and loved Charles Manson, joining his camp on the old Spahn ranch in Death Valley. She had a child, Zee Zo Zeze Zedfrack, father unknown, in 1968. On 8-9 August 1969, she joined in the ritualistic killing of five people, holding eight-month pregnant Sharon Tate while Tex Watson stabbed her to death. While in prison, she later had a "religious conversion" (1974), which she described in her 1977 memoir. She later began a prison ministry. In 1981 she was married for a few months to a Texan named Donald Lee Laisure who claimed he was a millionaire. He also claimed that she was his 29th wife, later saying that she was his 36th. She married again in 1987, this time to James Whitehouse, who subsequently became a lawyer.
While in prison her health deteriorated. In 2008 she was diagnosed with brain cancer and underwent a leg amputation as well. Atkins died at age 61 on 24 September 2009 at a women's prison in Chowchilla, California.
Susan Atkins as a Projector 4/6 in Human Design
Projector 4/6 — Design at a Glance
Susan Atkins had the Projector Aura, which felt like a bright flashlight: dense and focused. This design allowed her to immediately spot system errors in her environment – she saw the darkness in others. However, this ability also carried risks. If Susan Atkins actively addressed or tried to correct these deficits, she often encountered resistance; her direct confrontation was perceived as unpleasant, similar to shining light directly into someone's face.
The mechanics of her design showed that Projectors do not have a constant intrinsic energy source in the Sacral Center. Instead, they went through phases of high intensity followed by an urgent need for rest to avoid burnout. The optimal strategy did not lie in active intervention but rather in attracting through their own harmony and waiting for an honest invitation. Only then would her leadership be accepted and effective.
If Susan Atkins lived according to this logic, it led to success. Deviations from it – such as ignoring the need for restraint or attempting to lead without invitations – resulted in bitterness as an expression of her non-self. Her energy was designed to illuminate others' paths, but only effectively when she did not impose against the will of her environment but rather was sought out.
Self-Projected Authority
Susan Atkins possessed the Projector Authority 'Authority in Self', a rare configuration that shaped her decision-making process. Her inner truth lay in her identity, yet she faced the challenge of great openness and the danger of being distracted by external influences, particularly motoric energies. The greatest trap consisted of losing herself in this openness and constantly searching for energy.
Her decisions arose through two paths. First, through spontaneous expressions: self-talk or responses to others' invitations. Crucial was distinguishing between her true essence and intellect. What she spontaneously expressed without reflection spoke her true self and made her uniqueness recognizable to others. Second, a physical pull acted as a directional guide. Susan Atkins felt herself drawn geographically or thematically towards certain things.
By following this physical direction faithfully, she could become an orientation point for others and unleash her specific potential for success. This mechanism required constant vigilance against being distracted by surrounding energy, otherwise the clarity of spontaneous self-expression would be lost.
The 4/6 Profile — Opportunist / Role Model
Susan Atkins showed a strong urge to experiment in her youth, particularly in interpersonal relationships. Her Human-Design Profile 4/6 shaped this phase: In the first thirty years, Line Six acted similarly to a third line, leading to promising but often chaotic social experiments. She sought intense belonging and tested various roles in relationships and friendships.
This early behavior was part of an ongoing internal tension. Her design carried the conflict between her heart's (Line Four) emotional need for community and the intellectual distance of her Head Center (Line Six), which reflected on meaning. While she gave herself openly in youth, she later learned that her big heart needed to be cautious not to get hurt by false people.
Over time, her stance developed towards a soft role model. Line Six brought unwavering hope for better relationships and deeper unity. She increasingly understood that every interaction was a necessary step. At the same time, she recognized the importance of discretion and proper timing to avoid conflicts. Her development consisted in connecting the optimism of Line Six with the necessary restraint of Line Four to act as a cooperative role model without losing herself.
Single Definition — Defined & Open Centers
Susan Atkins was characterized by a stable inner axis defined by her Ajna, Throat, and G Centers. This endowed her with consistent mental clarity, reliable expression ability, and a firm identity. She thought persistently in concepts and articulated these directly, driven by a clear sense of direction and love for herself. This configuration created an external authority: she conditioned her environment through her opinions and led others with her strong conviction without being easily influenced.
At the same time, due to open centers – Head, Heart, Sacral, Solar Plexus, Spleen, and Root – she was highly dependent on her surroundings. Without internal sources for inspiration, willpower, generative energy, or emotional stability, she absorbed these energies situationally. The open Head Center made her vulnerable to foreign mental pressure waves and confusion; she tended to seek answers that were not her own. Her undefined Heart Center lacked consistent willpower, which led her into spirals of self-proving as she tried to earn value through performance rather than possessing it.
Her open Sacral Center made her receptive to the energy of others often to the point of exhaustion, while her open Solar Plexus Center amplified foreign emotions and personalized them. This caused her to fluctuate between emotional extremes and avoid confrontation out of fear of rejection or overreact in response. The undefined Spleen Center generated a deep survival anxiety that bound her to insecure environments as she sought false comfort. Finally, her open Root Center absorbed external stress leading to cycles of chaos and burnout as she tried to release pressure that was never hers. This combination of a firm inner voice and high receptivity to external energies significantly shaped her dynamics.
Channels for inspiration, reflection and structured insight.
Susan Atkins showed profound receptiveness for mutations and new directions. Her Personality Sun in Gate 2 (Line 4) laid the groundwork: She did not actively respond but absorbed outer changes and transformed them into evolutionary perspectives. This Sphinx energy made her a recipient of impulses that served as raw material for new paths.
This inner transformation was expressed through the Channel of Inspiration 1-8. This channel connected the G Center with the Throat Center, enabling her to articulate her mutative perspective creatively and publicly. Through Gate 1 of Self-expression and Gate 8 of Contribution, she acted as a creative individual who attracted attention through presence. She lived her identity rather than just explaining it, inspiring or challenging others in the process. This channel required courage to stand out from the crowd and created an impact through exemplary living.
Mentally, Susan Atkins processed these impulses via the Channel of Structuring 23-43 in her design. Here, Ajna Center connected with Throat Center, linking spontaneous insights (Gate 43) with their assimilation and formulation (Gate 23). She could express innovative thoughts clearly but this heavily depended on timing. Without patience for recognition, she risked being misunderstood or feeling alienated. This channel ensured that her innovative thinking was brought into a comprehensible form as circumstances allowed.
In the background, the juxta Channel of the Lost Son 13-33 acted as a reflective instance. It connected G Center with Throat Center through Gate 13 of Listener and Gate 33 of Withdrawal. Susan Atkins gathered experiences and secrets to withdraw later and process them. This channel promoted a patient observation of life cycles, extracting lessons from the past before communicating them. It was a process of observing and categorizing that brought continuity into her experience processing.
Individual Circuitry — Circuit Signature
Susan Atkins exhibited a complex identity dynamics fueled by two parallel streams. The Knowledge Circuit in her connected Ajna, Throat, and Identity Centers into one flow. This promoted pulsating, acoustic energy driven by the Channel of Inspiration (Gates 1-8) and Structuring (Gates 23-43). She tended to pioneer new paths and initiate changes through individual creativity. Parallel to this, the Meaning Circuit connected Throat and Identity Centers. Here, a cyclical visual processing of past emotional experiences prevailed, carried by the Channel of the Lost Son (Gates 13-33). This stream served reflection and sharing clarified insights with the collective. Both circuits converged into communication through the Throat Center. There was tension between the innovative, pulsating creation of new identity in the Knowledge Circuit and the wave-like emotional processing of past experiences for meaning-making in the Meaning Circuit. Susan Atkins lived this duality: on one hand, a drive towards mutation and new knowledge, on the other, the necessity to process and share past emotions. As her definition was simple, these energies flowed coherently together without internal fractures or separate groups. Her design marked her as someone who both wanted to pioneer new paths while remaining deeply entrenched in the emotional resonance spaces of the past to draw meaning from them and express it.
Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
Susan Atkins' design carried the signature of the right Sphinx 2 cross. This configuration shaped a fundamental disposition characterized by profound intuition and a strong desire for inner truth. In Human Design, this cross marks a specific energetic alignment where the individual often acts as a mirror for collective or personal shadows. It is not about superficial perception but rather the ability to uncover hidden dynamics and integrate them into their own experiential world.
For Susan Atkins, this meant that she was likely strongly guided by internal impulses more connected with intuitive understanding than rational analysis. The right Sphinx 2 cross points to an energy inclined to penetrate complex emotional or spiritual themes. It is a structure that often manifests in phases of intense inner transformation, forcing the individual to confront their deepest fears and desires.
This mechanism created a backdrop where Susan Atkins' actions and reactions were heavily dependent on her subjective perception of reality. She lived in a world filtered through her own internal landscape, leading to a unique yet isolating perspective. The design promoted a kind of authenticity that often came with a high degree of inner conflict as intuition constantly clashed with external expectations or social norms.
Projector · Self-Projected Authority — Synthesis
Susan Atkins' design reveals someone deeply oriented towards recognizing patterns and transforming knowledge. A central red thread runs through her chart: the combination of an open Head Center, which takes in and amplifies information, paired with a defined Throat and G-Center. This points to a natural ability to transform subtle perceptions into expressive power while maintaining a strong identity – inner wisdom projected outward. The connection between Gate 23 (Assimilation) and 43 (Insight) enhances this tendency towards processing information and formulating new perspectives, while Channel 1-8 emphasizes the capacity to inspire simply through presence. This constellation points to someone destined at their core to share knowledge and influence others, yet always contingent on the right invitation and timing.
A central paradox lies in the tension between her open perception and need for authenticity. While she is vulnerable to external conditioning through undefined centers (Head, Heart, Sacral, Spleen), the defined G-Center offers an anchor point for direction and identity. This constellation generates a dynamic where she is both receptive to others' energies while striving to uphold her own truth – a constant balancing act between adaptation and self-assertion.
3 Defined Channels
Incarnation Cross - Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
Solar Return
The Solar Return shows the moment when the sun returns to its exact birth position - your personal solar year.
Life Cycles
Discover the life cycles with a detailed triple view (birth chart, cycle chart, composite).
Human Design Profile
- Type
- Projector
- Strategy
- Wait for the respectful invitation
- Authority
- Self-Projected Authority
- Profile
- 4/6 - Opportunist / Role Model
- Definition
- Single Definition
- Incarnation Cross
- Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
- Date of Birth
- 07.05.1948 01:03
- Place of Birth
- San Gabriel, CA, United States
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Human Design Type was Susan Atkins?
Which profile did Susan Atkins have in Human Design?
What authority did Susan Atkins possess?
Which incarnation cross did Susan Atkins have?
When was Susan Atkins born?
Discover your own Human Design
Are you also a Projector? Find out in a personal reading how to unfold your leadership qualities and recognize the right invitations.
More Personalities
Back to overviewSissy Spacek
Alain-Fournier
Anémone
Angeli
Ann-Margret
Bourvil