Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Susan Atkins
Human Design Chart
Biography
A hippie dropout product of the drug culture, she met and loved Charles Manson, joining his camp on the old Spahn ranch in Death Valley. She had a child, Zee Zo Zeze Zedfrack, father unknown, in 1968. On 8-9 August 1969, she joined in the ritualistic killing of five people, holding eight-month pregnant Sharon Tate while Tex Watson stabbed her to death. While in prison, she later had a "religious conversion" (1974), which she described in her 1977 memoir. She later began a prison ministry. In 1981 she was married for a few months to a Texan named Donald Lee Laisure who claimed he was a millionaire. He also claimed that she was his 29th wife, later saying that she was his 36th. She married again in 1987, this time to James Whitehouse, who subsequently became a lawyer.
While in prison her health deteriorated. In 2008 she was diagnosed with brain cancer and underwent a leg amputation as well. Atkins died at age 61 on 24 September 2009 at a women's prison in Chowchilla, California.
Susan Atkins as a Projector 4/6 in Human Design
Projector 4/6 — Design at a Glance
Susan Atkins possessed as a Projector an aura that seemed like a bright flashlight: dense and focused. This design allowed her to immediately recognize system errors in her environment – she saw the darkness in others. Yet, this ability also carried risks within it. If Susan Atkins actively addressed or attempted to correct these deficiencies, she often encountered resistance; her direct confrontation was perceived as unpleasant, comparable to shining a light directly into someone's face.
The mechanics of her design showed that Projectors do not have a constant intrinsic energy source in the Sacral Center. Instead, they went through phases of high intensity followed by an urgent need for rest to avoid exhaustion. The optimal strategy did not lie in active intervention but rather in attracting others through their own harmony and waiting for an honest invitation. Only then would her leadership be accepted and effective.
If Susan Atkins lived according to this logic, it led to success. Deviations from it – such as ignoring the need for restraint or attempting to lead without invitations – resulted in bitterness as an expression of her non-self. Her energy was designed to illuminate others' paths, but only effectively when she did not impose against the will of her environment, but rather was sought out by it.
Self-Projected Authority
Susan Atkins possessed the Projector Authority 'Authority in Self', a rare configuration that shaped her decision-making process. Her inner truth lay in her identity, yet she faced the challenge of great openness and the danger of being distracted by external influences, particularly motor energies. The greatest trap was losing herself in this openness and constantly seeking energy.
Her decisions arose through two paths. First, through spontaneous expressions: self-talk or responses to others' invitations. Crucial was distinguishing between her true essence and intellect. What she spontaneously expressed without thinking reflected her genuine self and made her uniqueness recognizable to others. Second, a physical pull served as a directional guide. Susan Atkins felt herself being drawn geographically or thematically towards certain things.
By faithfully following this physical direction, she could become an orientation point for others and unleash her specific success potential. However, this mechanism required constant vigilance against the distractibility of surrounding energy, otherwise losing clarity in spontaneous self-expression.
The 4/6 Profile — Opportunist / Role Model
In her youth, Susan Atkins showed a strong desire to experiment, particularly in interpersonal relationships. Her Human Design profile 4/6 shaped this phase: In the first thirty years, line six acted similarly to a third line, leading to promising but often chaotic social attempts. She intensely sought belonging and tested various roles in relationships and friendships.
This early behavior was part of a lifelong internal tension. Her design carried the conflict between her heart's (line four) emotional need for community and the intellectual distance of her head (line six), which wanted to reflect on meaning. While she openly gave herself in her youth, she later learned that her big heart had to be cautious not to get hurt by false people.
Over time, her attitude developed towards a soft role model. Line six brought an unwavering hope for better relationships and deeper union with others. She increasingly understood that every interaction was a necessary step. At the same time, she recognized the importance of discretion and proper timing to avoid conflicts. Her development consisted in combining the optimism of line six with the necessary restraint of line four to act as a cooperative role model without losing herself.
Single Definition — Defined & Open Centers
Susan Atkins was characterized by a stable inner axis defined by her Ajna, Throat, and G Centers. This endowed her with consistent mental clarity, reliable expression ability, and firm identity. She thought persistently in concepts and articulated them directly, driven by a clear sense of direction and love for herself. This configuration created external authority: she conditioned her environment through her opinions and led others with her strong conviction without being easily influenced.
At the same time, due to open centers - Head, Heart, Sacral, Solar Plexus, Spleen, and Root - she was highly dependent on her surroundings. Without internal sources for inspiration, willpower, generative energy, or emotional stability, she absorbed these energies situatively. The open Head Center made her vulnerable to foreign mental pressure waves and confusion; she tended to seek answers that were not her own. The undefined Heart Center lacked consistent willpower, causing her to spiral into self-proving cycles as she tried to earn value through performance rather than possessing it.
Her open Sacral Center made her receptive to the energy of others, often to exhaustion, while her open Solar Plexus Center amplified foreign emotions and personalized them. This led her to swing between emotional extremes and avoid confrontation out of fear of rejection or overreact in response. The undefined Spleen Center generated a deep survival anxiety that bound her to insecure environments as she sought false comfort. Finally, her open Root Center absorbed external stress, leading to cycles of frenzy and burnout as she tried to release pressure that was never hers. This combination of a firm inner voice and high receptivity to external energies significantly shaped her dynamics.
Channel 8-1: Inspiration — Channels & Gates
Susan Atkins was marked by profound receptiveness to mutations and new directions. Her Personality Sun in Gate 2 (Line 4) laid the groundwork: she did not actively respond but absorbed outer changes and transformed them into evolutionary perspectives. This Sphinx energy made her a recipient of impulses serving as raw material for new paths.
This inner transformation was expressed through the Channel of Inspiration 1-8. This channel connected the G Center to the Throat Center, enabling her to creatively and publicly articulate her mutative perspective. Through Gate 1 of Self-expression and Gate 8 of Contribution, she acted as a creative individual who drew attention through presence. She lived out her identity rather than just explaining it, inspiring or challenging others. This channel required courage to stand out from the crowd and created an impact through exemplary living.
Susan Atkins processed these impulses mentally via the Channel of Structuring 23-43 in her design. Here, Ajna Center connected with Throat Center spontaneous insights (Gate 43) with their assimilation and formulation (Gate 23). She could express innovative thoughts clearly but this heavily depended on timing. Without patience until recognition, she risked being misunderstood or feeling alienated. This channel ensured that her innovative thinking was brought into a comprehensible form when circumstances allowed.
In the background, the juxta Channel of the Lost Son 13-33 acted as a reflective instance. It connected G Center with Throat Center through Gate 13 of Listener and Gate 33 of Withdrawal. Susan Atkins collected experiences and secrets to withdraw later and process them. This channel promoted a patient observation of life cycles, extracting lessons from the past before communicating them. It was a process of observing and categorizing, bringing continuity to her experience processing.
Individual Circuitry — Circuit Signature
Susan Atkins exhibited a complex identity dynamics fueled by two parallel streams. The Knowledge Circuit in her connected Ajna, Throat, and Identity Centers into one flow. This promoted pulsating, acoustic energy driven by the Channel of Inspiration (Gates 1-8) and Structuring (Gates 23-43). She tended to pioneer new paths and initiate changes through individual creativity. Parallel to this, the Meaning Circuit operated, connecting Throat and Identity Centers. Here, a cyclical, visual processing of past emotional experiences prevailed, carried by the Channel of the Lost Son (Gates 13-33). This stream served reflection and sharing elucidated insights with the collective. Both circuits converged in communication through the Throat Center. There was tension between the innovative, pulsating creation of new identity in the Knowledge Circuit and the wave-like emotional processing of past for meaning-making in the Meaning Circuit. Susan Atkins lived this duality: on one hand, the urge towards mutation and new knowledge, on the other, the necessity to process and share past emotions. As her definition was simple, these energies flowed coherently together without internal fractures or separate groups. Her design marked her as someone who wanted to pioneer new paths while remaining deeply entrenched in the emotional resonance spaces of the past to draw meaning and express it.
Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
Susan Atkins' design carried the signature of the right cross of the Sphinx 2. This configuration shaped a fundamental disposition characterized by profound intuition and a strong desire for inner truth. In Human Design, this cross marks a specific energetic alignment where the individual often acts as a mirror for collective or personal shadows. It is not about superficial perception but rather the ability to uncover hidden dynamics and integrate them into their own experiential world.
For Susan Atkins, this meant that she was likely strongly guided by inner impulses that were less connected with rational analysis than with an intuitive understanding of the situation. The right cross of the Sphinx 2 points to an energy that tends to penetrate complex emotional or spiritual themes. It is a structure that often manifests during phases of intense internal transformation, where the individual is forced to confront their deepest fears and desires.
This mechanism created a backdrop in which Susan Atkins' actions and reactions were heavily dependent on her subjective perception of reality. She lived in a world filtered through her own inner landscape, leading to a unique but also isolating perspective. The design promoted a kind of authenticity that often came with a high degree of internal conflict as intuition constantly clashed with external expectations or social norms.
Saturn Return · Uranus Opposition · Chiron Return · 2nd Saturn Return — Life Cycles
Susan Atkins' design was marked by the rhythmic flow of astrological transits serving as temporal markers for inner transformation processes. Since no specific Human Design components such as defined centers or channels were present, her character structure cannot be derived from the internal mechanics; instead, external planetary influences acted as contextual frameworks for the course of her life.
The first Saturn return cycle marked a point where earlier impulses and decisions faced their initial rigorous test. This transit often demanded consolidation of identity and responsibility regardless of individual strategy. Following this was the Uranus opposition, a period when pressure to break free from established structures intensified. This phase frequently brought sudden insights or breaks with old bonds leading to potential realignment.
Later came the Chiron return cycle. From a Human Design perspective, this is not a moment of healing ancient wounds in a mythological sense but rather a fulfillment cycle. Here, the potential emerged to increasingly realize one's life purpose – if previously lived according to personal strategy – and make it experientially meaningful. It was a phase of bloom where the incarnation task became clearer.
The second Saturn return cycle rounded off this process. It stood for further condensation of life experience and acceptance of limits as well as possibilities in advanced age. Susan Atkins' path was thus less determined by specific internal HD architecture but rather characterized by navigating these universal temporal cycles, each bringing its own challenge and learning field.
Projector · Self-Projected Authority — Synthesis
Susan Atkins' design shows a person deeply oriented towards recognizing patterns and transforming knowledge. A central red thread runs through her chart: the combination of an open Head Center that takes in and amplifies information with a defined Throat and G-Center. This points to a natural ability to transform subtle perceptions into expressive power while maintaining a strong identity – inner wisdom projected outward. The connection between Gate 23 (Assimilation) and 43 (Insight) strengthens this tendency towards processing information and formulating new perspectives, while Channel 1-8 emphasizes the capacity to be inspiring through mere presence. This constellation points to someone whose core is destined to disseminate knowledge and influence others, though always contingent on the right invitation and timing.
A central paradox lies in the tension between her open perception and need for authenticity. While she is vulnerable to external conditioning through undefined centers (Head, Heart, Sacral, Spleen), the defined G-Center offers an anchor point for direction and identity. This constellation generates a dynamic where she is both receptive to others' energies while striving to maintain her own truth – a constant balancing act between adaptation and self-assertion.
3 Defined Channels
Incarnation Cross - Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
Solar Return
The Solar Return shows the moment when the sun returns to its exact birth position - your personal solar year.
Life Cycles
Discover the life cycles with a detailed triple view (birth chart, cycle chart, composite).
Human Design Profile
- Type
- Projector
- Strategy
- Wait for the respectful invitation
- Authority
- Self-Projected Authority
- Profile
- 4/6 - Opportunist / Role Model
- Definition
- Single Definition
- Incarnation Cross
- Right Angle Cross of the Sphinx 2
- Date of Birth
- 07.05.1948 01:03
- Place of Birth
- San Gabriel, CA, United States
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Susan Atkins' Human Design type?
What Profile did Susan Atkins have in Human Design?
What Authority did Susan Atkins possess?
What incarnation cross did Susan Atkins have?
When was Susan Atkins born?
Discover your own Human Design
Are you also a Projector? Find out in a personal reading how to unfold your leadership qualities and recognize the right invitations.
More Personalities
Back to overviewSissy Spacek
Alain-Fournier
Anémone
Angeli
Ann-Margret
Bourvil